Recently, public schools, grade K-12, have been armed with
weapons and military equipment in 10 Texas school districts. The federal 1033
Program provides “military surplus for free or at a very low cost to local police
departments” assisting in monitoring the safety of public schools. The
individual school districts can voluntarily return the guns. Some school police
departments claim that they need the weapons in instances of active school
shootings, even though they are rare.
Griffin argues that the government should “keep military
gear out of Texas schools.” Local and National civil rights, and advocacy
organizations are against the distribution of the guns into public schools.
They have called the U.S. Department of Defense to end the transfer of the
weapons to the local school district police department. Few school police
department do not have the proper resources to train their officers to use the
military weapons. The organization suggest that the weapons could pose a
dangerous risk if guns were handled by untrained hands in school settings.
Current federal guidance advised instead that schools
emphasize more on evacuation plans and early identification, and intervention
with the potential aggressors. The school police department should focus on
common scenarios in more effective ways, such as, working with students with
mental disabilities, and practicing de-escalation techniques intended to
prevent and reduce further violence in hostile situation.
The Texas school police department has a history of having
aggressive techniques to subdue violators at school. In the past 2 years, Texas
Appleseed filed 2 complaints against school districts whose policing policies
were violating students’ civil rights. In Bastrop, a Hispanic student was tased by a sheriff deputy
while the boy was breaking up a fight at school. The taser caused the boy permanent brain damage. This incident showed
the people if we cannot trust regularly armed school police department to act
appropriately to a basic school fight, what makes any parent feels safe with
their child at school where the police officers are armed with military grade
weapons.
The tone of the editorial was formal and informative. The audience intended was for the parents of the K-12 schools that were affected by the 1033 Program. Brennan introduced the subject well. He began b defining what the Federal 1033 Program was and the reasoning for the program. He brought the problems with the schools handling the guns issue to light. Brennan mentioned of the actions he and other organizations did to speak out on the distribution of the guns. He then continued by including examples of why the program was not necessary and gave alternative techniques school police officers could use to help lower the level of hostile situations. The piece could have ended on a stronger note. Brennan ended on a lighter note commending the school police officers on how they did on reducing the numbers in issuing misdemeanors to the students.
No comments:
Post a Comment